Skip to main content

Failure theories

When a component is subject to increasing loads it eventually fails. It is comparatively easy to determine the point of failure of a component subject to a single tensile force. The strength data on the material identifies this strength. However when the material is subject to a number of loads in different directions some of which are tensile/compressive  and some of which are shear, then the determination of the point of failure is more complicated.

Metals can be broadly separated into 'Ductile' metals and 'Brittle' metals. Examples of ductile metals include mild steel, copper etc . Cast iron is a typical brittle metal.Ductile metals under high stress levels initially deform plastically at a definite yield point or progressively yield. In the latter case a artificial value of yielding past the elastic limit is selected in lieu of the yield point e.g 2%proof stress. 
At failure a ductile metal will have experienced a significant degree of elongation. Brittle metals experience little ultimate elongation prior to failure and failure is generally sudden.
A ductile metal is considered to have failed when it has suffered elastic failure, that is when a marked plastic deformation has begun. 
There are five important failure theories, namely 
(1) Maximum Principal stress theory
(2) Maximum Principal Strain theory
(3) Maximum shear stress theory, 
(4) Maximum strain energy theory, and 
(5) Maximum distortion energy theory.

1.The maximum principal stress theory :

The theory also called as Rankine stress theory.This theory is approximately correct for cast iron and brittle materials generally.


According to this theory failure will occur when the maximum principal stress (tensile or compressive) in a system reaches the value of the maximum strength at elastic limit in simple tension.                     
\begin{align}
\sigma_{max} &= \left(\frac{\sigma_x + \sigma_y}{2} \right )+\sqrt{(\frac{\sigma_x- \sigma_y}{2})^2+ {\tau_{xy}}^2}
\end{align}

Failure is predicted in this theory when either of the principal stresses(σ1 or σ2 ) is equqls or exceeds the yield stress σy of the material.

 σ1 = σy   OR   σ2  = σy
The design Factor of Safety 'n' for two dimensional stress case is, 
Facor of safety  n =σy/σ1 
n = Elastic Limit stress in tensile test / highest principal stress

2.Maximum Principal Strain theory 

It is also called St. Venant's theory. Yielding will occur when the maximum principal strain just exceeds the strain at the tensile yield point in either simple tension or compression.
e1, e2 are maximum and minimum principal strains corresponding normal stresses σ1 and σ2, then

3.The Maximum Shear Stress Theory :


The theory associated with Tresca and Guest.This is very relevant to ductile metals. It is conservative and relatively easy to apply.
According to this theory, that failure occurs when a maximum shear stress attains a certain value. This value being the value of shear strength at failure in the tensile test. 
In this instance it is appropriate to choose the yield point as practical failure. If the yield point = σy and this is obtained from a tensile test and thus is the sole principal stress then,
the maximum shear stress txy is easily identified as σy /2 . 
txy = σy /2
In the context of a complicated stress system the initial step would be to determine the principle stress i.e. σ1, σ1 and σ3-
then the maximum shear stress would be determined 

The Maximum Shear Stress tmax  will be Greatest of 
 ( σ1 - σ2 ) / 2 or  ( σ2 - σ3 ) / 2  or ( σ1 - σ3 ) / 2



The factor of safety selected would be
n = σy / ( 2 . t max ) = σy / ( σ1 - σ3 )

4.Strain Energy Theory :

The theory associated with Haigh.
This theory is based on the assumption that strains are recoverable up to the elastic limit, and the energy absorbed by the material at failure up to this point is a single valued function independent of the stress system causing it. 
The strain energy per unit volume causing failure is equal to the strain energy at the elastic limit in simple tension.
The following relationship can be derived from this theory.
σy - is the yield point in simple shear and
ν = poisson's ratio. 
Failure Occurs with this theory when,

12 + (σ22 + (σ3 ) 2 -  2v.(σ12 + σ23 + σ13 )     ≥   (σy2

5.Distortion Energy Theory 

Also called Shear Strain Energy Theory
This theory is also known as the Von Mises-Hencky theory. Detailed studies have indicated that yielding is related to the shear energy rather than the maximum shear stress..
Strain energy is energy stored in the material due to elastic deformation. The energy of strain is similar to the energy stored in a spring. Upon close examination, the strain energy is seen to be of two kinds : one part results from changes in mutually perpendicular dimensions , and hence in volume, with no change angular changes: the other arises from angular distortion without volume change. The latter is termed as the shear strain energy , which has been shown to be a primary cause of elastic failure..
Failure is predicted when the distortional energy associated with the principal stresses, σ1,2,3 equals or exceeds the distortional energy corresponding to that for the yield strength, σy, of the material in uniaxial tension or compression.
(σ1 - σ2) 2 + (σ2 - σ3) 2 + (σ1 - σ3 ) 2 = 2 σy2

Comparison of Theories:

1.Out of these five theories of failure, the maximum principal stress theory,maximum principal strain theory and strain energy theories are only applicable for brittle materials.
2.The maximum shear stress theory and distortion energy theory are applicable for ductile materials. Out of these two, the distortion energy theory provides most accurate results in majority of the stress conditions.
3.The strain energy theory needs the value of Poisson’s ratio of the part material, which is often not readily available.
4.The maximum shear stress theory is conservative. 
5.For simple unidirectional normal stresses all theories are equivalent, which means all theories will give the same result.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Relation between Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity

Modulus of Elasticity (E)   It is the ratio between Normal stress to Normal strain within the elastic limit. Elastic Modulus E = Normal stress/Normal strain E =  s/e Modulus of Rigidity (G)  It is the ratio between Shear stress to Shear strain within the elastic limit. Rigidity Modulus G = Shear stress/ Shear strain G =    Ƭ / ø   Relation between Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity: Consider a solid cube  PQRS is  subjected to a shearing force F.  Let  Ƭ     be the shear stress produced in the faces PQ and RS due to this shear force. The complementary shear stress consequently produced in the vertical faces PS and RQ is also equal to same and shown in figure as Ƭ   Due to the pure shearing force, the cube is deformed PQRS to PQR'S' . The point   S moved to S' and point R moved to R' as shown in fig.  The shear strain = The angle of distortion  ø                          ø = RR'/ RQ ---(1) Shear strain = Shear stress /Rigidity modulus                

PORTAL METHOD and CANTILEVER METHOD

The behavior of a structure subjected to horizontal forces depends on its height to width ratio. The deformation in low-rise structures, where the height is smaller than its width, is characterized predominantly by shear deformations. In high rise building, where height is several times greater than its lateral dimensions, is dominated by bending action. To analyze the structures subjected to horizontal loading we have two methods. Portal method  and Cantilever method 1. PORTAL METHOD The portal method is an approximate analysis used for analysing building frames subjected to lateral loads such as Wind loads/ seismic forces.  Since shear deformations are dominant in low rise structures, the method makes simplifying assumptions regarding horizontal shear in columns.  Each bay of a structure is treated as a portal frame, and horizontal force is distributed equally among them. Assumptions in portal method   1. The points of inflection are located at the mid-height of each column above th

Shearing Stresses Distribution in Circular Section

Show that the shearing stress developed at the neutral axis of a beam with circular cross section is  τ max = (4/3)(F/πr2). Assume that the shearing stress is uniformly distributed across the neutral axis.  Solution : Let us consider the circular section of a beam as displayed in following figure. We have assumed one layer EF at a distance y1 from the neutral axis of the circular section of the beam Shear stress at a section will be given by following formula as mentioned here Where, F = Shear force (N) τ = Shear stress (N/mm2) A = Area of section, where shear stress is to be determined (mm2) ȳ = Distance of C.G of the area, where shear stress is to be determined, from neutral axis of the beam section (m) Q = A. ȳ = Moment of the whole shaded area about the neutral axis I = Moment of inertia of the given section about the neutral axis (mm4) For circular cross-section, Moment of inertia, I = ПR4/4 b = Width of the given section where shear stress is to be determined. Let us consider on